Risk-Reward Ratio Myths Every Trader Believes

Risk-Reward Ratio Myths Every Trader Believes

Introduction: The Most Misunderstood Concept in Trading

Ask any trader about risk-reward ratio, and you’ll hear confident answers like:

  • “I only take 1:3 trades.”

  • “High risk-reward means higher profits.”

  • “If my risk-reward is good, I’ll be profitable.”

Yet statistically, most traders still lose money.

So the question is simple:

👉 If risk-reward ratio is so powerful, why do traders with ‘perfect’ ratios still fail?

The truth is uncomfortable:

Risk-reward ratio is one of the most misunderstood and misused concepts in trading.

In this blog, we’ll break down the biggest risk-reward myths traders believe, why they’re dangerous, and how professional traders actually use risk-reward as part of a complete performance system.


What Is Risk-Reward Ratio (Quick Definition)

The risk-reward ratio compares:

  • How much you are willing to risk on a trade

  • Versus how much you expect to gain

Example:

  • Risk ₹1 to make ₹3 → 1:3 Risk-Reward Ratio

On paper, this looks perfect.
In reality, numbers alone don’t make you profitable.


Myth #1: “A Higher Risk-Reward Ratio Means Higher Profits”

This is the most dangerous belief in trading.

Many traders assume:

“If I trade 1:5 or 1:10 setups, I’ll be rich even if I lose often.”

The Reality:

A high risk-reward ratio is useless without a realistic win rate.

Let’s look at real data:

Risk-RewardWin Rate Needed to Break Even
1:150%
1:233%
1:325%
1:517%

Now ask yourself honestly:
👉 Can you consistently win 20% of your trades with precision?

Most retail traders:

  • Enter late

  • Exit emotionally

  • Move stop-losses

  • Book profits early

Which means theoretical risk-reward never matches reality.


Myth #2: “If I Maintain 1:3 Risk-Reward, I’ll Be Profitable”

This belief ignores trade execution and behavior.

Traders say:

“My setup is 1:3, but I’m still losing.”

Here’s why:

What Actually Happens:

  • You exit winners early → 1:1.5 instead of 1:3

  • You hold losers hoping → losses exceed planned risk

  • Slippage, emotions, hesitation distort outcomes

So your actual risk-reward looks nothing like your planned risk-reward.

💡 Without journaling real execution data, traders lie to themselves.

This is why professional traders track:

  • Planned RR vs Achieved RR

  • Emotional exits

  • Rule violations

Platforms like LINCFOLIO expose the truth behind your trades.


Myth #3: “Risk-Reward Works the Same for Every Trading Style”

A huge mistake.

Different styles require different risk-reward expectations:

Trading StyleTypical Win RateTypical RR
ScalpingHighLow (1:0.8 – 1:1.5)
IntradayMediumBalanced (1:1.5 – 1:3)
SwingLowerHigher (1:3 – 1:5)

Trying to force:

  • 1:5 RR in scalping, or

  • 1:1 RR in swing trading

…leads to frustration and losses.

👉 Risk-reward must match your strategy, timeframe, and psychology.


Myth #4: “Risk-Reward Is More Important Than Win Rate”

This myth divides traders into extremes:

  • Some chase high RR

  • Others chase high win rate

Professionals focus on expectancy.

Expectancy Formula:

 
Expectancy = (Win Rate × Avg Win) − (Loss Rate × Avg Loss)

Example:

  • Win rate: 40%

  • Avg win: ₹2,000

  • Avg loss: ₹1,000

Expectancy = Positive → Profitable

👉 Balanced risk-reward + realistic win rate beats extreme ratios every time.


Myth #5: “My Strategy Is Bad Because Risk-Reward Isn’t Working”

Often, the strategy isn’t broken, the process is.

Common real issues:

  • Overtrading

  • Inconsistent position sizing

  • Emotional exits

  • No post-trade analysis

  • No performance review

Without reviewing actual trade data, traders keep changing strategies instead of fixing execution.

This is where trading journals become non-negotiable.


How Professional Traders Actually Use Risk-Reward

Professionals don’t obsess over one number.

They track:

  • Average achieved RR

  • Drawdowns

  • Risk per trade

  • Performance by setup

  • Emotional mistakes

They ask:

  • Which setups give the best expectancy?

  • Where do I violate my stop-loss?

  • Which trades perform better even with lower RR?

This is performance trading, not hope-based trading.


Why Journaling Changes Everything

Most traders think they have good risk-reward.

Data says otherwise.

A structured trading journal like LINCFOLIO helps traders:

  • See real vs assumed risk-reward

  • Identify profitable setups

  • Fix emotional patterns

  • Improve consistency over time

You can’t improve what you don’t measure.


Final Truth: Risk-Reward Is a Tool, Not a Guarantee

Let’s be clear:

❌ Risk-reward alone won’t make you profitable
❌ High ratios don’t compensate for poor execution
❌ Chasing perfect RR often destroys consistency

✅ Profits come from process, discipline, and data-backed decisions


Conclusion: Stop Believing Myths, Start Tracking Reality

If you’re serious about trading:

  • Stop chasing magical risk-reward numbers

  • Start tracking actual performance metrics

  • Treat trading like a business, not a bet

Because in the end:

Trading without records is gambling.

And consistency is built not guessed.


🔹 Want to See Your Real Risk-Reward?

Start journaling your trades the professional way with LINCFOLIO, where data reveals truth, not illusions.

risk-reward ratio in trading, risk reward ratio myths, best risk reward ratio, trading risk management, profitable trading strategies, trading journal analysis, trading mistakes, trader psychology, trading journal, Lincfolio, stock market

Share the Post:

Related Posts